- 10 - 4. Expectation That Assets May Appreciate in Value Petitioner does not contend and the record does not suggest that there are any assets involved with petitioner’s Reliv activity that may appreciate in value. We view this factor as neutral. 5. Success in Carrying On Similar Activities Insofar as the record reveals, petitioner has engaged in no other activities similar to his Reliv activity, by which we might evaluate his success in those other activities. We view this factor as neutral. 6. History of Income or Losses Petitioner has never realized a profit from his years of Reliv activity. Rather, for the year at issue and the preceding 5 years, petitioner’s claimed operating expenses for his Reliv activity exceeded his revenues therefrom by factors ranging from about 10 to 24. Petitioner suggests that these losses are due to his Reliv activity’s being in a startup phase; he suggests that it is in the nature of the Reliv business to experience a dramatic profit spike at some point. Petitioner offered no concrete information, however, to convince us that his expectation of a future revenue spike is more than wishful thinking. This factor favors respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008