Angelo N. & Jo E. Grandelli - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          Manual (CCH), pt. 5.19.2., at 18,303 (Apr. 1, 2007).  Given their           
          past problems with filing income tax returns, petitioners should            
          not have relied on the IRS to notify them that their 1996 amended           
          return and their 1997 return had not been received.  If the IRS             
          had not sent petitioners any notification that their 1997 return            
          was delinquent before 2002, this would not be an unreasonable               
          error or delay under section 6404(e) because that section does              
          not permit abatement of interest regardless of how long the IRS             
          takes to first contact the taxpayer.  Downing v. Commissioner,              
          118 T.C. 22, 30-31 (2002); Cannon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.               
          2002-205; Hanks v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-319.  Therefore,           
          we find it was petitioners’ error that ultimately caused the                
          delay in petitioners’ payment of their 1997 income tax                      
          liabilities.                                                                
               We agree with petitioners that they generally have a                   
          reasonable expectation that items they send in the mail will be             
          received.  However, because petitioners were aware that several             
          of the returns they mailed to the IRS were not received,                    
          petitioners should have taken steps to ensure that the IRS                  
          received their subsequent returns.  Furthermore, petitioners have           
          not offered any evidence showing that the IRS’s failure to                  
          receive petitioners’ amended 1996 return or 1997 return before              
          2002 was due to any error committed by the IRS.  Because                    
          petitioners bear the burden of proof, the absence of any evidence           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008