- 7 - and made her check payable to the Washington State Department of Revenue. PCI did not deduct the $160,000 payment on its Federal income tax return for 2001. PCI issued petitioner a Form 1099- MISC for the $160,000 payment rather than a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. PCI did not withhold tax on the $160,000 payment. Respondent mailed a deficiency notice to petitioner treating the $160,000 payment as a bonus not a gift, as petitioner asserts. Petitioner filed a timely petition. OPINION Petitioner did not report the $160,000 payment and contends that it was a gift. Respondent determined that the $160,000 payment was includable in petitioner’s 2001 income and that petitioner is liable for an accuracy-related penalty. Petitioner contends that she is not liable for the accuracy-related penalty because she acted with reasonable cause and in good faith in reliance upon the advice of her lawyer and tax preparer. We address each issue in turn. Inclusion of the $160,000 Payment in Petitioner’s Income5 We first consider whether petitioner should have included the $160,000 payment in income. Petitioner failed to include this amount in income on her return even though PCI issued her a 5Petitioner conceded that she bears the burden of proof on this issue. See Rule 142(a).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008