Brian E. & Marcie L. Mallin - Page 6




                                        - 5 -                                         
          Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); Welch v. Helvering,           
          290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                                                   
               Generally, section 280A(a) prohibits deductions allocable to           
          the business use of a “dwelling unit” used by a taxpayer during             
          the taxable year as a personal residence.  However, if a portion            
          of the dwelling unit is used as a taxpayer’s principal place of             
          business, deductions allocable to that use are permitted, though            
          they are limited if the gross income from the business use is               
          less than the total business expenses.  Sec. 280A(c)(1), (5).               
          Here, petitioners had insufficient gross income from their                  
          woodworking business in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to offset deductions           
          for either the furnace or the workshop after the application of             
          section 280A(c)(5).                                                         
               Respondent does not dispute the Wyoming workshop was used as           
          petitioners’ principal place of business with respect to their              
          woodworking business.  The issue is simply whether the garage-              
          turned-workshop should be considered part of the Wyoming                    
          residence and thus be subject to the home office limitations of             
          section 280A.                                                               
               Notably, the workshop was attached to the house, and                   
          petitioners used its entrance to gain access to the residence in            
          the winter.  Aside from common sense--an attached garage is                 
          considered part of one’s home under normal circumstances--caselaw           
          has held that even a detached office building located on the same           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008