Raymond L. Monk, Jr. - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
               We also find that this mistake should not give rise to an              
          accuracy-related penalty under Internal Revenue Code section                
          6662(a) (2004).  Monk provided correct information to the                   
          accountant (he gave him all the information he had), and the                
          mistake was a result of his accountant’s entirely understandable            
          error.  That’s all Monk needs to show under section 1.6664-                 
          4(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations.  See, e.g., Westbrook v.             
          Commissioner, 68 F.3d 868, 881 (5th Cir. 1995), affg. T.C. Memo.            
          1993-634.                                                                   
               When all the evidence is considered, the picture becomes               
          clear that Monk’s relationship with Maney regarding Chuck’s Place           
          is truly that of a landlord/tenant.  Because this will trigger              
          various computational adjustments,                                          


                                             Decisions will be entered                
                                        under Rule 155.                               




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13

Last modified: March 27, 2008