New York Guangdong Finance, Inc. - Page 29




                                       - 29 -                                         
          See secs. 6651(a)(1), 6001; Ellwest Stereo Theatres of Memphis,             
          Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-610; sec. 1.1461-2, Income            
          Tax Regs.  Consequently, petitioner is obligated to prove that              
          the failure to file Forms 1042 was due to reasonable cause and              
          not due to willful neglect.  See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C.           
          438, 447 (2001).                                                            
               A failure to file is due to reasonable cause where a                   
          taxpayer “exercised ordinary business care and prudence and was             
          nevertheless unable to file the return within the prescribed                
          time”.  Sec. 301.6651-1(c)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  Although             
          courts have sometimes found reasonable cause in determining the             
          amount of a taxpayer’s liability for the addition to tax where a            
          taxpayer relies upon expert advice, a taxpayer ordinarily is                
          responsible for ascertaining tax obligations such as filing                 
          deadlines.  United States v. Boyle, supra at 251.  Lay persons              
          know that filing deadlines exist, and “reliance cannot function             
          as a substitute for compliance with an unambiguous statute.”  Id.           
          However, where a taxpayer reasonably relied on the advice of a              
          competent accountant or attorney in possession of all relevant              
          facts that it was unnecessary to file a return, reasonable cause            
          may exist, even if the advice turns out to be mistaken.  Id. at             
          250.                                                                        
               Petitioner does not contend that it was unaware that a                 
          withholding liability might exist as a result of making interest            







Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008