- 9 - penalties). Consequently, the Court sustains respondent’s imposition of an addition to tax pursuant to section 6651(a)(1). C. Section 6654(a) Addition to Tax Section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax for underpayment of estimated income tax by an individual taxpayer. That addition to tax is computed by reference to four required installment payments of the taxpayer’s estimated tax liability, each constituting 25 percent of the “required annual payment.” Sec. 6654(d)(1)(A). For taxpayers whose adjusted gross income for the preceding year was $150,000 or less, the “required annual payment” is equal to the lesser of (1) 90 percent of the tax shown on the individual’s return for the year or, if no return is filed, 90 percent of his or her tax for such year, or (2) if the individual filed a return for the immediately preceding taxable year, 100 percent of the tax shown on that return. Sec. 6654(d)(1)(A), (B)(i) and (ii). Here, petitioner failed to file a 2004 Federal income tax return and made no estimated tax payments for 2004 except for the amount withheld from her wages.8 Petitioner had a tax liability 8 Again, because petitioner’s “zero return” is deemed invalid, it is as though she filed no return for her 2004 taxable year. In addition, the $3,573.81 in Federal income tax withheld from petitioner’s wages is creditable under sec. 31 and is treated as a payment of estimated tax pursuant to sec. 6654(g)(1). See Mendes v. Commissioner, 121 T.C. 308, 323 n.12 (2003). However, in light of her unreported income, petitioner underpaid her estimated tax for 2004 and respondent has (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008