Dwight S. & Antonina K. Platt - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          6662(a)1 on, petitioners’ respective Federal income tax for 2002:           

               Petitioners        Deficiency     Accuracy-Related Penalty             
          Dwight S. Platt and        $3,531                $706                       
          Antonina K. Platt                                                           
          Herbert Bangs and          2,175                 435                        
          Christine Bangs                                                             
               We must decide whether certain payments that petitioner                
          Herbert Bangs (Mr. Bangs) made during 2002 to petitioner Antonina           
          Platt (Ms. Platt) are deductible or excludable from Mr. Bangs’              
          income for his taxable year 2002 and includible in Ms. Platt’s              
          income for her taxable year 2002.2  We hold that they are not.              
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               All of the facts in these cases, which the parties submitted           
          under Rule 122, have been stipulated by the parties and are so              
          found except as stated below.                                               
               Petitioners in the case at docket No. 4467-06, Ms. Platt and           
          Dwight Platt (Mr. Platt), resided in Stevenson, Maryland, at the            
          time they filed the petition in that case.  Petitioners in the              
          case at docket No. 7221-06, Mr. Bangs and Christine Bangs (Ms.              


               1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to             
          the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year at issue.           
          All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  
               2Respondent made certain additional determinations in the              
          respective notices of deficiency that respondent issued to                  
          petitioners in these cases, the resolution of which flows auto-             
          matically from our resolution of the determinations in those                
          respective notices that we address herein.  See also infra note             
          33.                                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008