Rose Lynn Richmond - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          from petitioner’s retirement account in connection with the 1998            
          levy (described above).                                                     
               In July 2001, petitioner submitted to respondent a Form                
          1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 1998.  Petitioner              
          claimed that she was entitled to a prepayment credit of $53,290             
          for 1998--an amount that included the $24,844 figure for tax                
          withholding referred to in the notice of deficiency and the                 
          $8,736 and $11,468 amounts respondent collected pursuant to the             
          1998 levy and applied to petitioner’s accounts for the taxable              
          years 1982 and 1985.                                                        
               On May 22, 2002, the Court entered an agreed decision at               
          docket No. 9419-01 which provided that petitioner was liable for            
          a deficiency of $34,163 for 1998, as well as additions to tax of            
          $2,097, $233, and $114 pursuant to sections 6651(a)(1) and (2)              
          and 6654, respectively.  The parties stipulated (below the                  
          signature of the Judge who entered the decision) that (1)                   
          petitioner was entitled to a prepayment credit of $24,844 for               
          1998, and (2) the deficiency of $34,163 was computed without                
          taking the prepayment credit into account.  No appeal was filed,            
          and the Court’s decision at docket No. 9419-01 is long since                
          final.  Secs. 7481(a)(1), 7483.                                             
          Collection Action for 1998                                                  
               Although respondent sent to petitioner a number of notices             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008