-7-
and respondent filed his motion for leave less than 4 months
after filing his answer. Furthermore, petitioner presumably
prepared a defense in his criminal case which would require the
presentation of much of the same evidence as the civil case
before this Court.
Conclusion
Put simply, respondent’s motion for leave to file amendment
to answer has been submitted without undue delay, respondent has
complied with the Court’s Rules, and petitioner will not be
prejudiced by the granting of respondent’s motion.
To reflect the foregoing,
An appropriate order will be
issued granting respondent’s motion
for leave to file amendment to
answer.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: March 27, 2008