- 5 - above, were electronically transferred to Wise’s business checking account. All of the above-referenced deductions were disallowed in the notice of deficiency. According to an explanation included in the notice of deficiency, the deduction for commissions and fees was disallowed because “no deduction is allowed for any compensation that is unreasonable or excessive”. The explanation for the disallowance of that deduction went on to note that petitioner had failed to “establish that the amount shown was (a) compensation, and (b) paid”. Various reasons are given in the notice of deficiency for the disallowances of the other deductions listed above, including petitioner’s failure to substantiate the payments of the underlying expenses. Discussion In general, a taxpayer is entitled to a deduction for all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in carrying on any trade or business. Sec. 162(a). Depending upon the nature of the business, the disallowed deductions here in dispute fall into categories of expenses generally recognized as deductible under section 162(a). The nature of and the manner in which petitioner conducted his business, as either an employee of Wise or an independent contractor of NPC, have been described only in general terms, and many details are unknown. At trial petitioner attempted toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008