Ronald B. and Annette C. Talmage - Page 55




                                        - 55 -                                        
         Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers seven factors to            
         determine whether a debtor-creditor relationship existed, with no            
         single factor being determinative.21  Welch v. Commissioner, supra           
         at 1230.  The factors are:  (1) Whether the promise to repay is              
         evidenced by a note or other instrument; (2) whether interest was            
         charged; (3) whether a fixed schedule for repayment was                      
         established; (4) whether collateral was given to secure payment;             
         (5) whether repayments were made; (6) whether the borrower had a             
         reasonable prospect of repaying the loan and whether the lender              
         had sufficient funds to advance the loan; and (7) whether the                
         parties conducted themselves as if the transaction was a loan.               
         Id.                                                                          
              The Court will address the purported loans separately                   
         beginning with the loans for the development and operation of the            
         Rivercliff property, followed by the loans for the purchase of the           
         Rivercliff property and the loans for petitioner’s family support            
         obligations.                                                                 
              A.   The Rivercliff Property Development and Operating Loans            
                   1.   Whether the Promise To Repay Was Evidenced by a               
                        Note or Other Instrument                                      
              A note or other instrument is indicative of a debtor-creditor           
         relationship.  Teymourian v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-232.              

               21 Because petitioner resides in the State of Oregon, absent           
          stipulation otherwise, an appeal of this case would go to the               
          U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  See sec.                      
          7482(b)(1)(A).                                                              






Page:  Previous  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008