- 55 - Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers seven factors to determine whether a debtor-creditor relationship existed, with no single factor being determinative.21 Welch v. Commissioner, supra at 1230. The factors are: (1) Whether the promise to repay is evidenced by a note or other instrument; (2) whether interest was charged; (3) whether a fixed schedule for repayment was established; (4) whether collateral was given to secure payment; (5) whether repayments were made; (6) whether the borrower had a reasonable prospect of repaying the loan and whether the lender had sufficient funds to advance the loan; and (7) whether the parties conducted themselves as if the transaction was a loan. Id. The Court will address the purported loans separately beginning with the loans for the development and operation of the Rivercliff property, followed by the loans for the purchase of the Rivercliff property and the loans for petitioner’s family support obligations. A. The Rivercliff Property Development and Operating Loans 1. Whether the Promise To Repay Was Evidenced by a Note or Other Instrument A note or other instrument is indicative of a debtor-creditor relationship. Teymourian v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-232. 21 Because petitioner resides in the State of Oregon, absent stipulation otherwise, an appeal of this case would go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See sec. 7482(b)(1)(A).Page: Previous 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008