- 86 - preponderance of evidence, that the failure to report the gain on the Black Butte property was not fraudulent. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that petitioner’s failure to report the $15,616 from the sale of the Vancouver property and the $60,303 from the sale of the Black Butte property was due to fraud. B. Section 6662 Accuracy-Related Penalty Section 6662(a) imposes a 20-percent accuracy-related penalty on the portion of any underpayment attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations. Sec. 6662(b). The term “negligence” includes any failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of the internal revenue laws or to exercise ordinary and reasonable care in the preparation of a tax return. Sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1), Income Tax Regs. Respondent bears the burden of production with respect to any penalty or addition to tax. Sec. 7491(c); Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446- 447 (2001). To meet his burden of production, respondent must come forward with sufficient evidence indicating that it is appropriate to impose the penalty. Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at 446-447. Respondent contends Annette C. Talmage is liable for the accuracy-related penalty for 2002 under section 6662(a) on the same underpayment of tax upon which the Court found petitioner liable for the fraud penalty under section 6663(a).Page: Previous 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008