Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279, 22 (1992)

Page:   Index   Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22

300

NORMAN v. REED

Scalia, J., dissenting

factionalism decrease as the political unit becomes larger. There is not much chance the State as a whole will be ham-strung by a multitude of so-called "parties," each of which represents the sectional interest of only one or a few districts; there is a real possibility that the Cook County Board will be stalemated by an equal division between "City Party" and "County Party" members. But the litigants here have not addressed whether the "complete slate" requirement is unconstitutional, and I decline to speculate. It must be assumed to be legitimate, in which case there is no basis for saying that 25,000 signatures for each district election (if that is less than 5% of the votes in the prior district election) cannot be demanded. The Court's holding that these cases are simply governed by Socialist Workers Party seems to me quite wrong. I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22

Last modified: October 4, 2007