United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 18 (1992)

Page:   Index   Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18

346

UNITED STATES v. WILSON

Stevens, J., dissenting

should be made is fully consistent with the purposes of the statute and with its text.14

For the foregoing reasons, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

14 The information required for the sentencing judge to make a credit determination could easily become part of the information that is routinely provided to the judge in the presentence report. Such a report already contains the convicted offender's prior criminal history, which includes much of the information necessary to decide whether he is eligible for credit for time in custody. The report could contain the amount of jail credit the person is entitled to, and if there are other sentences pending or unserved, a recommendation whether the current sentence should be concurrent or consecutive to any prior sentences.

Page:   Index   Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18

Last modified: October 4, 2007