Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 40 (1992)

Page:   Index   Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40

316

WRIGHT v. WEST

Souter, J., concurring in judgment

Inge v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 360, 366, 228 S. E. 2d 563, 568 (1976). It is simply insupportable, then, to say that reasonable jurists could not have considered this rule compatible with the Jackson standard. There can be no doubt, therefore, that in the federal courts West sought the benefit of a "new rule," and that his claim was barred by Teague.

On this ground, I respectfully concur in the judgment of the Court.

Page:   Index   Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40

Last modified: October 4, 2007