Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 32 (1992)

Page:   Index   Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32

468

MEDINA v. CALIFORNIA

Blackmun, J., dissenting

phasis added). See also id., at 141 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment) (prosecution must show "no significant risk that the medication will impair or alter in any material way the defendant's capacity or willingness to react to the testimony at trial or to assist his counsel") (emphasis added).

I consider it no less likely that petitioner Medina was tried and sentenced to death while effectively unable to defend himself. That is why I do not share the Court's remarkable confidence that "[n]othing in today's decision is inconsistent with our longstanding recognition that the criminal trial of an incompetent defendant violates due process." Ante, at 453. I do not believe the constitutional prohibition against convicting incompetent persons remains "fundamental" if the State is at liberty to go forward with a trial when the evidence of competency is inconclusive. Accordingly, I dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32

Last modified: October 4, 2007