National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 510 U.S. 249, 17 (1994)

Page:   Index   Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17

Cite as: 510 U. S. 249 (1994)

Souter, J., concurring

ard to a complaint based on presumptively protected First Amendment conduct).

This is not the place to catalog the speech issues that could arise in a RICO action against a protest group, and I express no view on the possibility of a First Amendment claim by the respondents in this case (since, as the Court observes, such claims are outside the question presented, see ante, at 262, n. 6). But I think it prudent to notice that RICO actions could deter protected advocacy and to caution courts applying RICO to bear in mind the First Amendment interests that could be at stake.

265

Page:   Index   Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17

Last modified: October 4, 2007