Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 14 (1996)

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14

Cite as: 517 U. S. 806 (1996)

Opinion of the Court

petitioners would have us do, which particular provisions are sufficiently important to merit enforcement.

For the run-of-the-mine case, which this surely is, we think there is no realistic alternative to the traditional common-law rule that probable cause justifies a search and seizure.

* * *

Here the District Court found that the officers had probable cause to believe that petitioners had violated the traffic code. That rendered the stop reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, the evidence thereby discovered admissible, and the upholding of the convictions by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit correct. The judgment is

Affirmed.

819

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14

Last modified: October 4, 2007