Cite as: 521 U. S. 844 (1997)
Opinion of O’Connor, J.
of adults are infringed only by the "display" provision and by the "indecency transmission" and "specific person" provisions as applied to communications involving more than one adult, I would invalidate the CDA only to that extent. Insofar as the "indecency transmission" and "specific person" provisions prohibit the use of indecent speech in communications between an adult and one or more minors, however, they can and should be sustained. The Court reaches a contrary conclusion, and from that holding I respectfully dissent.
897
Page: Index Previous 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54Last modified: October 4, 2007