Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit, 522 U.S. 446, 2 (1998) (per curiam)

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2

522us2$25H 12-04-98 14:38:53 PAGES OPINPGT

Cite as: 522 U. S. 446 (1998)

Stevens, J., dissenting

with this Court. In his petition and supplemental petition, Arteaga appears to assert that he is an innocent person falsely imprisoned and to allege numerous constitutional violations and conspiracies among prison, court, and government officials. He does not address the reasons for the District Court's dismissal.

Accordingly, we enter this order barring prospective in forma pauperis filings by petitioner in noncriminal cases for the reasons discussed in Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

It is so ordered.

Justice Stevens, dissenting.

For reasons previously stated, see Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1, 4 (1992) (Stevens, J., dissenting), and cases cited, I respectfully dissent.

447

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2

Last modified: October 4, 2007