Hohn v. United States, 524 U.S. 236, 30 (1998)

Page:   Index   Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30

Cite as: 524 U. S. 236 (1998)

Scalia, J., dissenting

our federal criminal justice system, produced by various aspects of this Court's habeas corpus jurisprudence. And the purpose of the specific provision of AEDPA at issue here is also not obscure: It was designed, in intelligent reliance upon a holding of this Court, to end § 2255 litigation in the district court unless a court of appeals judge or the circuit justice finds reasonable basis to appeal. By giving literally unprecedented meaning to the words in two relevant statutes, and overruling the premise of Congress's enactment, the Court adds new, Byzantine detail to a habeas corpus scheme Congress meant to streamline and simplify. I respectfully dissent.

265

Page:   Index   Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30

Last modified: October 4, 2007