United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 36 (1998)

Page:   Index   Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36

356

UNITED STATES v. BAJAKAJIAN

Kennedy, J., dissenting

the Constitution. Nonremedial fines may be subject to deference in theory but overbearing scrutiny in fact. So-called remedial penalties, most in rem forfeitures, and perhaps civil fines may not be subject to scrutiny at all. I would not create these exemptions from the Excessive Fines Clause. I would also accord genuine deference to Congress' judgments about the gravity of the offenses it creates. I would further follow the long tradition of fines calibrated to the value of the goods smuggled. In these circumstances, the Constitution does not forbid forfeiture of all of the $357,144 transported by respondent. I dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36

Last modified: October 4, 2007