Arizona Dept. of Revenue v. Blaze Constr. Co., 526 U.S. 32, 8 (1999)

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

Cite as: 526 U. S. 32 (1999)

Opinion of the Court

federal funds. Therefore, we see no need to depart from the clear rule announced in New Mexico.

* * *

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

39

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

Last modified: October 4, 2007