Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 40 (1999)

Page:   Index   Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40

40

NEDER v. UNITED STATES

Opinion of Scalia, J.

again remembered that delays and little inconveniences in the forms of justice are the price that all free nations must pay for their liberty in more substantial matters; that these inroads upon this sacred bulwark of the nation are fundamentally opposite to the spirit of our constitution; and that, though begun in trifles, the precedent may gradually increase and spread to the utter disuse of juries in questions of the most momentous concern." 4 Blackstone, Commentaries *350.

See also Bollenbach v. United States, 326 U. S. 607, 615 (1946). Formal requirements are often scorned when they stand in the way of expediency. This Court, however, has an obligation to take a longer view. I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40

Last modified: October 4, 2007