Prunty v. Brooks, 528 U.S. 9, 2 (1999) (per curiam)

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2

10

PRUNTY v. BROOKS

Stevens, J., dissenting

prevent Prunty from petitioning to challenge criminal sanctions which might be imposed on him. The order will, however, allow this Court to devote its limited resources to the claims of petitioners who have not abused our processes.

It is so ordered.

Justice Stevens, dissenting.

For reasons previously stated, see Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1, 4 (1992) (Stevens, J., dissenting), and cases cited, I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2

Last modified: October 4, 2007