Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861, 53 (2000)

<< Previous   Index

Cite as: 529 U. S. 861 (2000)

Stevens, J., dissenting

petitioners' cause of action, and because I cannot agree with the Court's unprecedented use of inferences from regulatory history and commentary as a basis for implied pre-emption, I am convinced that Honda has not overcome the presumption against pre-emption in this case. I therefore respectfully dissent.

913

<< Previous   Index

Last modified: October 4, 2007