Cite as: 530 U. S. 133 (2000)
Ginsburg, J., concurring
demonstrated, by evidence the district court is required to credit on a motion for judgment as a matter of law, see ante, at 151, that discrimination could not have been the defendant's true motivation. If such conclusive demonstrations are (as I suspect) atypical, it follows that the ultimate question of liability ordinarily should not be taken from the jury once the plaintiff has introduced the two categories of evidence described above. Because the Court's opinion leaves room for such further elaboration in an appropriate case, I join it in full.
155
Page: Index Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Last modified: October 4, 2007