Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 101 (2000)

Page:   Index   Previous  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101

566

APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY

Breyer, J., dissenting

dural protections might well be desirable, for the reasons Justice O'Connor discusses and those I have discussed, I do not believe the Constitution requires them where ordinary sentencing factors are at issue. Consequently, in my view, New Jersey's statute is constitutional.

I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101

Last modified: October 4, 2007