New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483, 42 (2001)

Page:   Index   Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42

524

NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. TASINI

Stevens, J., dissenting

See id., at 8 ("The efficiency, accuracy, reliability, comprehensiveness and immediacy of access offered by searchable full-text digital archives are but a few of the benefits historians and other researchers have reaped from the advancement in the technology of information").

Because it is likely that Congress did not consider the question raised by this case when drafting § 201(c), because I think the District Court's reading of that provision is reasonable and consistent with the statute's purposes, and because the principal goals of copyright policy are better served by that reading, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The majority is correct that we cannot know in advance the effects of today's decision on the comprehensiveness of electronic databases. We can be fairly certain, however, that it will provide little, if any, benefit to either authors or readers.

Page:   Index   Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42

Last modified: October 4, 2007