Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 35 (2002)

Page:   Index   Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35

764

HOPE v. PELZER

Thomas, J., dissenting

entitled to qualified immunity. It was not at all clear in 1995 that respondents' conduct violated the Eighth Amendment, and they certainly could not have anticipated that this Court or any other would rule against them on the basis of nonexistent allegations or allegations involving the behavior of other prison guards. For the foregoing reasons, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35

Last modified: October 4, 2007