THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte YOSHIHIKO AIHARA, TADAAKI ISOZAKI,
NORIKO YAMAKAWA and ICHIRO KAWAMURA
________________
Appeal No. 95-4830
Application 07/899,3611
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before DOWNEY, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1Application for patent filed June 16, 1992. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/863,316, filed April 1, 1992, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/736,596, filed July
26, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007