Ex parte CALLAGHAN et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-2179                                          Page 10           
          Application 07/613,466                                                        
          parameter--evoked potential--to produce the same result--the                  
          depolarization gradient.  (Compare '900 at 2:29-53 with                       
          Paper 1 at 4:12-14; see also Callaghan '497 at 7:51-54                        
          and 8:25-66.)  The fact that the means in Callaghan '900 are                  
          specified in greater detail does not obscure the fact that the                
          same structures accomplish the same function in both claims.                  
               21. We find that the means for comparing and controlling                 
          based on a parameter are equivalent to the closed-loop control                
          means.  Again, Callaghan '900 simply defines the same                         
          structures accomplishing substantially the same function in                   
          greater detail.  Appellants contend that Callaghan '900 does                  
          not have a closed loop.  (E.g., Paper 18 at 16.)  We agree                    
          with the examiner that this unsupported contention does not                   
          make sense on its face.  Callaghan '900 appears to meet the                   
          definition presented in the third full paragraph on page 10 of                
          Appellant's second revised brief, quoting I. Singer et al.,                   
          Initial Clinical Experience with a Rate Responsive Pacemaker,                 
          12 PACE 1458, 1459 (1989).  To the extent a subtle difference                 
          exists, Appellants have failed to explicate it.  Cf. Clintec                  
          Nutrition Co. v. Baxa Corp., 44 USPQ2d 1719, 1723 n.16 & text                 
          (N.D. Ill. 1997) (Court will not look for evidence that party                 
          has failed to present directly).                                              







Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007