Ex parte DOWZALL et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-2148                                                          
          Application 08/295,829                                                      


               Appellants’ invention pertains to an auxiliary nib unit                
          having a relatively thin nib for use in conjunction with a marker           
          implement having a relatively broad nib.  When attached to the              
          marker implement, the relatively thin nib of the auxiliary unit             
          engages the nib of the marker implement to convert the implement            
          into one having a finer nib.  Independent claim 1, a copy of                
          which is appended to appellants’ brief, is exemplary of the                 
          claimed subject matter.                                                     
               The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                
          support of rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                            
          Yokosuka et al. (Yokosuka)    4,913,175      Apr.   3, 1990                 
          Ayme                          1,005,487      Sept. 22, 1965                 
          (British Patent)                                                            
          Levasseur                     2,489,753      Mar.  12, 1982                 
          (French Patent)                                                             
          Fukui                         2,148,200      May   30, 1985                 
          (British Patent)                                                            
               Claims 3, 5, 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,           
          second paragraph, “as being indefinite for failing to                       
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter              
          which applicant regards as the invention” (answer, page 3).                 
               Claims 1-8, 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103             
          as being unpatentable over Ayme in view of Fukui and Yokosuka.              


                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007