Ex parte YOUNG et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 95-0537                                                          
          Application No. 08/077,709                                                  


          a-axis film having c-axis alignment in one direction                        
          (Specification, p. 6):                                                      
                    The substrate is heated in the laser ablation                     
               apparatus prior to deposition of the film.  For                        
               films grown with a substrate temperature between 810                   
               and 830EC, the majority of the film is c-axis                          
               textured, with small amounts of a-axis grains being                    
               formed.  In the preferred embodiment, the substrate                    
               temperature is initially made lower than this                          
               temperature, preferably by from 50 to 100EC, to                        
               promote a-axis nucleation      . . . . In the                          
               preferred embodiment, the substrate temperature was                    
               held at 700EC during deposition.  If desired,                          
               following nucleation of the a-axis film, the                           
               substrate temperature may be raised to ordinary                        
               processing temperatures to enhance the film                            
               crystallinity and superconducting properties of the                    
               film.                                                                  
          Despite the above-identified differences, the examiner has                  
          failed to explain how one having ordinary skill in the art                  
          would have arrived at the claimed invention based on the                    
          teachings in Beasley.  See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1444,              
          24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (the examiner bears the               
          initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of                          
          unpatentability).  Therefore, the rejection of claims 1, 2 and              
          5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Beasley is               
          reversed.                                                                   
                          Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103                            

                                         17                                           





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007