THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LALIT KUMAR
____________
Appeal No. 96-4002
Application No. 08/121,8491
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the application.
The claimed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for distinguishing between true and false echoes in an
1Application for patent filed September 16, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007