Ex parte KUMAR - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-4002                                                          
          Application No. 08/121,849                                                  


          ultrasonic liquid gauging system.  More particularly,                       
          Appellant indicates at page 5 of the specification that true                
          and false echoes in an echo profile are discriminated by                    
          determining the relative or actual energy content of the                    
          received echo signals.                                                      
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
          1.  A method for discriminating true and false echoes in an                 
          ultrasonic liquid gauging system comprising the steps of:                   
               a. transmitting an ultrasonic pulse toward the liquid                  
          surface;                                                                    
               b.   detecting true and false echoes after a                           
          transmission; and                                                           
               c.   identifying a true echo from a false echo based on                
          energy of the echoes by determining which echo has the higher               
          energy.                                                                     
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Snyder                   4,000,650                     Jan. 04,             
          1977                                                                        
          Baumoel                  4,203,324                     May  20,             
          1980                                                                        
          Leszczynski              5,157,639                                          
     Oct. 20, 1992                                                                    
               Claims 1-20 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Leszczynski in view of Snyder and                
          Baumoel.                                                                    
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007