THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte GERHARD KEUPER, KARL-HEINZ SENGER,
and ROLAND STOLLER
__________________
Appeal No. 96-4122
Application 08/077,4191
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and LEE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6 and 11. No claim has
been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Kawagoe et al. (Kawagoe) 4,827,416 May 02,
1989 Rapiejko et al. (Rapiejko) 5,001,647 Mar. 19,
1991 Shiraishi et al. (Shiraishi) 5,001,636 Mar.
19, 1991
1
Application for patent filed June 15, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007