Ex parte RICHMOND et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1998-0747                                                        
          Application 08/609,958                                                      


          reference.  In re Bozek, 416 F.2d 1385, 1390, 163 USPQ 545, 549             
          (CCPA 1969).                                                                
          Summary                                                                     
          (a)  None of the examiner’s rejections of the claims on                     
                    appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is sustained;                        
          (b)            a new rejection of each of the claims on appeal is           
                    entered under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                    
          This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to                
          37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule             
          notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off.              
          Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR §            
          1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be             
          considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                          
          37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN                 
          TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the          
          following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection           
          to avoid termination of proceedings (§ 1.197(c)) as to the                  
          rejected claims:                                                            
                         (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                   
                    claims so rejected or a showing of facts                          
                    relating to the claims so rejected, or both,                      
                    and have the matter reconsidered by the                           
                    examiner, in which event the application will                     
                    be remanded to the examiner. . . .                                
                                            10                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007