Ex parte SAPIEJEWSKI et al. - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                             
                                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                             
                                           (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                                                                                      Paper No. 22                        
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    _____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    _____________                                                         
                           Ex parte ROMAN SAPIEJEWSKI and MICHAEL J. MONAHAN                                              
                                                    _____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1999-0414                                                      
                                              Application No. 08/625,352                                                  
                                                   ______________                                                         
                                              HEARD: January 23, 2001                                                     
                                                  _______________                                                         
              Before KRASS, DIXON and BLANKENSHIP,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        

                         This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-30, all of the                 
                 pending claims.                                                                                          
                         The invention pertains to adjustments for headsets.  More particularly, a                        
                 coupling element for joining a headband and an earphone has a pivot.  The pivot                          
                 requires the application of a torque exceeding a predetermined threshold value in                        
                 order to cause rotation.  A torque threshold level adjuster is included for                              


                                                            1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007