Ex parte SAPIEJEWSKI et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-0414                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/625,352                                                                                  


                 establishing the threshold level.                                                                        


                         Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                     
                         1.   A headset comprising:                                                                       
                                a headband;                                                                               
                                a first earphone;                                                                         
                                a coupler coupling the headband and the earphone                                          
                         comprising a pivot having a torque resistance opposing the rotation                              
                         of said pivot intercoupling said headband and said earphone                                      
                         constructed and arranged to require applying a torque exceeding a                                
                         predetermined threshold value to cause rotation;                                                 
                                said pivot including a torque threshold level adjuster                                    
                         establishing said threshold level.                                                               
                         The examiner relies on the following references:                                                 
                 Bergin et al. (Bergin)                      5,185,807            Feb. 09, 1993                           
                 Mirmilshteyn et al. (Mirmilshteyn)          5,293,647            Mar. 15, 1994                           
                 Urella et al. (Urella)              5,590,213             Dec. 31, 1996                                  
                                                                           (filed Feb. 15, 1995)                          
                         Claims 1-4, 8-10, 14-16, 19, 21-24, 26, 28 and 29 stand rejected under 35                        
                 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Mirmilshteyn.  Further, claims 1, 11-13 and 25                         
                 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Bergin.  Claims 5-7, 11-                       
                 13 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  § 103 as unpatentable over Mirmilshteyn                        
                 in view of Urella and claims 17, 18, 20, 27 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                      


                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007