Ex Parte Domingues - Page 1




                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding              
                                           precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                            
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 __________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 __________                                                  
                                       Ex parte DAVID J. DOMINGUES                                           
                                                 __________                                                  
                                            Appeal No. 2006-3157                                             
                                          Application No. 10/417,608                                         
                                                ___________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                ___________                                                  
                Before HANLON, TORCZON and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
                HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of         
                claims 1-22 and 27-29.  Claims 23-26 and 30-33 are also pending.  Claims 30-33 are           
                allowed.  See final Office action mailed March 21, 2005, p. 1.  Claims 23-26 are objected    
                to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim.  See final Office action mailed March      
                21, 2005, p. 5.                                                                              
                      Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:        
                      1.    A refrigerator stable, unproofed chemically leavened bread or biscuit            
                dough composition comprising interior dough comprising encapsulated basic chemical           
                leavening agent and non-encapsulated acidic chemical leavening agent, wherein the            
                interior dough does not brown normally during baking if the interior dough is at an          
                exterior surface of the dough composition, and                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007