UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KAZUHIRO YANASE, HIDEKI AMEMIYA,
MAMORU FURUYA, and MAKOTO MAEKAWA
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0025
Application No. 09/792,151
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: August 29, 2007
__________
Before TERRY J. OWENS, HUBERT C. LORIN, and ANTON W. FETTING,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 2-9 and
11-16. 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b)
(2002).
The invention is directed to a method (independent claims 2, 5, 9, and 13)
and system (independent claim 7, 8, 15, and 16) for providing advertising
information. In particular, the invention seeks to provide advertising information
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013