The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LOUIS ROBERT LITWIN JR.
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0635
Application No. 10/176,598
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: June 22, 2007
__________
Before HUBERT C. LORIN, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The appeal is from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 2 and 4-23.
35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Claims 2 and 4-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) (2002) as being
unpatentable over Ward (U.S. 6,526,411 B1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013