Ex Parte Litwin - Page 6



            Appeal 2007-0635                                                                               
            Application 10/176,598                                                                         

                  expresses a dislike for a particular content item, either by skipping the item           
                  or through a rating system, the system records such instances in the meta-               
                  data associated with the user," (Ward, col. 8, lines 27-31). Hence, the system           
                  of Ward keeps track of media files in a generalized manner where a metric is             
                  developed in view of whether a song or video was played back or not.                     
                  …                                                                                        
                  … a user may play back an entire song (1 minute and 20 seconds long) and                 
                  "then rewound it to replay the last 20 seconds" whereby the developed                    
                  popularity metric is proportional to the total amount of time the media file             
                  was played (1 minute and 40 seconds, see specification, Background of the                
                  Invention and page 10, line 20 to page 11, line 2). When considering the                 
                  variability of how a media file may be played back on modem media devices                
                  (see above), keeping track of the "total amount of times a user plays back a             
                  media file" in the manner suggested by the Examiner, does not account for                
                  such operations where a user repeats a portion of a song or fast forwards to             
                  other parts of the song. The Examiner, in the reasoning of the Final                     
                  Rejection, could not come to such a conclusion to arrive at the elements of              
                  Claim 2, without applying hindsight analysis in view of Ward as to develop               
                  the Examiner's cited combination.                                                        
                         By applying the invention of Claim 2 where "each of the popularity                
                  metrics being proportional to an total amount of playback time that the user             
                  plays back a corresponding one of the media files", a media device provides              
                  a more accurate way of monitoring the playback of media files than                       
                  disclosed or suggested in Ward in combination with the Examiner’s stated                 
                  rationale.                                                                               
                         Applicant asserts that there is appreciable difference between keeping            
                  track of the "total amount of time" a media file is played, as claimed in                
                  Claim 2, versus the whether a media file was played back or not (see Ward,               
                  col. 7, lines 40-47, and col. 8, lines 28-40) for the reasons listed above.              
            Appeal Br. 4-5. Emphasis added.                                                                
            9. Appellant further argues that another difference between the claimed method                 
            and Ward is that the claimed method keeps track of the total time a media file has             
            been played back.                                                                              
                                                    6                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013