THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HIDEO SHIMIZU
__________
Appeal No. 94-1889
Application 07/890,0031
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner=s rejection of claims 1-
7, which are all of the claims in the application. Claim 1 is
illustrative and reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed May 29, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007