THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS R. OAKES,
PATRICIA M. STANLEY
and JEROME D. KELLER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3977
Application 08/004,0751
______________
HEARD: AUGUST 5, 1997
_______________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 27-31, 33, 38-42, and 46-66. These are
the only claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed January 13, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a division of 07/734,580 filed
July 23, 1991, now Patent No. 5,200,189 granted April 6, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007