Ex parte THOMAS R. OAKES, et al. - Page 6

                Appeal No. 95-3977                                                                                                            
                Application 08/004,075                                                                                                        

                (an aliphatic C  peroxycarboxylic acid)(see Beilfuss, column 2,                                                               
                lines 19-49).  Beilfuss teaches the addition of peracetic or                                                                  
                perpropionic acid to the composition to increase the stability or                                                             
                achieve a reduction in the crystallization temperature (column 3,                                                             
                lines 36-43).  Beilfuss also teaches that the composition can                                                                 
                contain biocidal compounds stable to oxidation “such                                                                          
                as...persuccinic acid, peradipic acid, and permaleic acid”                                                                    
                (column 4, lines 44-48).  The amounts of these additives used can                                                             
                be up to about 5% by weight of the solution (column 4, lines 52-                                                              
                53).  The pH of the solution is acidic or neutral (column 5,                                                                  
                lines 15-17).  None of the examples disclose the use of any                                                                   
                peroxycarboxylic acid additives.                                                                                              
                         Under section 102(b), anticipation requires that the prior                                                           
                art reference disclose, either expressly or under the principles                                                              
                of inherency, every limitation of the claim.  See In re King, 801                                                             
                F.2d 1324, 1326, 231 USPQ 136, 138 (Fed. Cir. 1986).   For a                           3                                      
                rejection under 35 U.S.C.  102 to be proper, the reference must                                                              
                clearly disclose the claimed subject matter or direct those                                                                   
                skilled in the art to this subject matter without any need for                                                                

                         3To be prior art under section 102(b), a reference must                                                              
                also be enabling but this issue has not been contested here.  See                                                             
                In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 708, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1657 (Fed. Cir.                                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007