Ex parte JERRY LIAO - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-1834                                                          
          Application 08/046,945                                                      


          closet component “without including as a part of said skeletal              
          support any structural members adjacent to said front panel                 
          across the area defined thereby . . . .”  However, viewing Figs.            
          1, 2 and 4 of the drawing it is readily apparent that the front             
          portion of the members 18 of the skeletal structure do indeed               
          contact the front panel 24.  Moreover, the front lower skeletal             
          member 16 can be considered to be “adjacent” the front panel 24.            
          Thus, claim 1 does not define the invention accurately in the               
          technical sense.                                                            
               In summary:                                                            
               The examiner’s rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is           
          reversed.                                                                   
               A new rejection of claim 1 is made under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          second paragraph.                                                           
               Any request for reconsideration or modification of this                
          decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences based             
          upon the same record must be filed within one month from the date           
          of the decision (37 CFR § 1.197).  Should appellant elect to have           







                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007