Ex parte JEFFERY MOORE - Page 2




                Appeal No. 96-2852                                                                                                            
                Application 08/055,573                                                                                                        


                         1.  A chalk box comprising:                                                                                          
                         a)  a case having a hollow cavity, said case including                                                               
                                 a generally teardrop-shaped main body section                                                                
                                 having a longitudinal axis and an arched neck                                                                
                                 joining the main body [section]  along its          2                                                        
                                 longitudinal axis, wherein the arched neck extends                                                           
                                 forwardly from said main body section and curves                                                             
                                 to one side thereof;                                                                                         
                         b)      a line aperture formed at a forward portion of                                                               
                                 the neck communicating with the interior of                                                                  
                                 the case;                                                                                                    
                         c)      a reel rotatably mounted within main body                                                                    
                                 section of the case; and                                                                                     
                         d)      a line wound on the reel and extending                                                                       
                                 through the aperture in the case, said line                                                                  
                                 exiting the case at an angle relative to the                                                                 
                                 longitudinal axis of the case.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                             
                         The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                                            
                obviousness are:                                                                                                              
                Vernon                                    660,672                          Oct. 30, 1900                                      
                Lyle                                      2,347,273                        Apr. 25, 1944                                      
                Baumgart                                  2,673,398                        Mar. 30, 1954                                      
                Millen                                    5,042,159                        Aug. 27, 1991                                      








                         2The term “the main body” in clause a of claim 1 lacks a                                                             
                proper antecedent basis.  It would appear that the word                                                                       
                --section-- should be inserted into claim 1 as indicated                                                                      
                above to correct this informality.                                                                                            
                                                                      2                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007